Re: WordPerfect (was: IBM overhauls iSeries for the long haul)

[michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

There was definitely a limitation per controller. I don't remember much
about it, but I like the open source idea. Might be fun to work with it
again, especially for the OV folks.

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:28:44 -0700, "Keith Carpenter" <CarpCon@xxxxxxx>
said:
> Can you recall anything about the interface that required special 5250
> features ?
> 
> I had heard that WP/400 utilized it's own workstation controller code. 
> The
> downside was a higher overhead which effectively limited the number of WP
> users per controller.
> 
> 
> 
> Michael wrote:
> > That last one would be whippy...never make it past the marketing mavens.
> >
> > I worked for a data comm company at the time that had a magic box to go
> > between AS/400, DEC VAX, mainframes, UNIX...somehow we thought having
> > WordPerfect on a 400 made sense. I implemented and it made it work...it
> > was pretty cool actually.
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
-- 
  
  michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx