Re: IBM overhauls iSeries for the long haul

["Keith Carpenter" <CarpCon@xxxxxxx>]

Any idea on how many AS/400s were produced or still in use ?
CISC vs RISC



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Al Barsa" <barsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: IBM overhauls iSeries for the long haul


>
>
>
>
>
> Depending on who you listen to (IBM doesn't talk) There were 25,000 to
> 35,000 S/38's, and 250,000 to 275,000 S/36s.
>
> Al
>
> Al Barsa, Jr.
> Barsa Consulting Group, LLC
>
> 400>390
>
> "i" comes before "p", "x" and "z"
> e gads
>
> Our system's had more names than Elizabeth Taylor!
>
> 914-251-1234
> 914-251-9406 fax
>
> http://www.barsaconsulting.com
> http://www.taatool.com
> http://www.as400connection.com
>
>
>
>
>              Pat Barber
>              <mboceanside@worl
>              dnet.att.net>                                              To
>              Sent by:                  Midrange Systems Technical
>              midrange-l-bounce         Discussion
>              s@xxxxxxxxxxxx            <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>                                                                         cc
>
>              08/12/2004 10:06                                      Subject
>              AM                        Re: IBM overhauls iSeries for the
>                                        long haul
>
>              Please respond to
>              Midrange Systems
>                  Technical
>                 Discussion
>              <midrange-l@midra
>                  nge.com>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> More than you can imagine. Since there was far more S/36
> installed than S/38(50 to 1, maybe much higher), you gotta
> imagine many of those folks never bothered to convert to
> "native".
>
> I have several customers who never bothered and never asked
> to be converted once they saw that the 400 could handle
> their software "as is".
>
>   Many have converted over the years, but some still run a few
> applications just as they were on the S/36. The S/36 customers
> are the reason the 400 exists today in my opinion.
>
> I don't believe "anybody" including IBM, has any idea how
> much S/36 code still runs. Remember the S/36 was wildly
> popular in other countries other than the USA.
>
> Of course IBM also didn't think many people were using
> OV/400.
>
> Shields, Ken wrote:
>
>
> That's another reason why IBM, rushed to put the Sys/36 out in the market.
> The S/36 was so popular, that even to-day, on the current release of
OS400,
> the Sys 36 Environment is still supported.
>
> I'm very curious to know just how many companies are still using the
> S36 Environment.
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>