RE: SQL vs. traditional I/O?

["Bob Cagle" <bcagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Now, why in the world would you even consider doing that?  The SQL
implementation in RPG is "clunky" at best - that's already been agreed
upon.  Why make the program harder to read/maintain when you would get
the same performance?

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark S. Waterbury [mailto:mark.s.waterbury@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 10:51 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: SQL vs. traditional I/O?

Hi, all:

Here's a "radical" idea -- would it not be "cool" if IBM could make the
embedded SQL pre-processor "smart enough" to recognize when you are
doing
"single row at a time" types of things, and under the covers, actually
generate "native" I/O? ;-)

Mark S. Waterbury

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.