× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. July 2004

RE: SQL vs. traditional I/O?


comments inline..


> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Pat Barber
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:06 PM
>
> performance issues continue to nag the whole thing.

Is this still true?  I thought well-designed SQL will perform as well as,
if
not better than, well-designed native I/O, for most applications as of one
of the V5 releases.
Dan Bale

As I said before, a dyed-in-the-wool traditionalist got better performance
out of his SQL (he decided that it wasn't fast enough to justify changing
his programming paradigm).

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.