RE: TCP/IP and programming connectivity problem (routing table question)

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Tom Liotta)]

midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>   6. Re: TCP/IP and programming connectivity problem (routing
>      table question) (Larry Bolhuis)
>
>   You are right on.  Internet RFCs stipulate that a host should not 
>respond to traffic from a host to which it does not have a route either 
>static (entered manually) or learned. OS/400 follows the RFCs as closely 
>as possible IP Routing is no exception. Some other 'wannabe' OSs will 
>simply respond back through the router (gateway) from which the packet 
>originated but this is a security exposure.

Yow, if true, I have seriously misunderstood the whole purpose of default 
routers pointing to routers and the whole Internet thing including DNS and 
other elements. I've seen dynamic routes appearing all the time on every AS/400 
I've ever run TCP/IP on.

I assume that some clarification will clear up what you're saying here.

Tom Liotta

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788 x313
Fax    253-872-7904
http://www.powertech.com


__________________________________________________________________
Introducing the New Netscape Internet Service. 
Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need. 

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp