|
Is there a way to have the inquiry message answered automatically, either by the system or some other application, so that the end user is not aware that the screen copy is taking place? Norman Boyd >>> qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx 04/29/04 03:49PM >>> Carel: STRCPYSCN is actually a cool solution to the original problem. A secondary session is only required if the copy-screen output is being sent to another display. If the output goes to a file, it can all be contained within the one session. I put together an applications problem logging tool that worked in this way and made it available to users via their <Attn> menues. When a user wanted to log an issue and have application support look it over, they'd take the "Start logging" menu option and answer 'Y' (or 'G' or whatever that required character was) when asked if screen copying was okay. Then they'd go through the sequence that had problems or needed clarification. When done, they'd take the "End logging" menu option. The logging tool created a new member to store the session in. It added an index entry to track user, member name, application, etc., whatever info was useful, and sent a message to application support saying "Hey, check this [member] out." App support could take a complementary menu options to replay the session including page-forward/page-backward, print the session, remove old sessions, etc. Printing was partly through an LF that translated DSPF field attributes and created a form suitable for other documentation. The printing aspect was used as part of creating user guides, sample test scripts, etc. STRCPYSCN can be a major plus if used creatively. Tom Liotta midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > 1. Re: Saving a session's history (Carel Teijgeler) > >I do not think STRCPYSCN will do, as such jobs are started from another >session and the inlogging user have to answer whether or not that proces may >be run (IIRC). > >Changing the job with a startup programme may be countered by them, if they >know the system well an ddo a simple CHGJOB, too. > >Auditing may be the only solution. > >On 29-4-04 at 10:02 sgallaher@xxxxxxx wrote: > >>Is there a 400 equivalent to the old S/36 HISTORY command? >> >>I'm looking for a way to keep track of everything someone did while >>they're signed on with their *SECOFR account (commands, STRSQL sessions, >>etc). The most detailed thing I can think of is writing some CL to issue >>the STRCPYSCN command when they log in. -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 x313 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.powertech.com __________________________________________________________________ Introducing the New Netscape Internet Service. Only $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Netscape. Just the Net You Need. New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.