× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. April 2004

RE: File Reorg - Cons

My experience with this runs a bit contrary to this.  We had some files on a
720 that had over ten million records with about ten percent or so deleted.
An attempt to execute RGZPFM ran for days without completing.  We then
attempted the CPYF method and that required just over half a day.

Why this is I have no clue because one would think RGZPFM would be faster.
Perhaps I should try it on a newer OS release as that was on V4R1.

Donald R. Fisher, III
Project Manager
Roomstore Furniture Company
(804) 784-7600 extension 2124
DFisher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<clip>
IMHO, RGZPFM should run faster than CPYF twice.
<clip>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.