Re: IBM Universal Connection and non-Cisco firwalls with NAT?

If you could, it would be appreciated.  We are getting a new iSeries soon
and it would be nice to set it up that way as opposed to over the phone
line.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Crosby" <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: RE: IBM Universal Connection and non-Cisco firwalls with NAT?


> > Has anyone actually setup UC with: V5R2, NAT firewall,
> > non-Cisco router, private iSeries address?
>
> We fit that bill _except_ we do have a Cisco router & firewall.  It took
> well over a year to get it set up.  Some of the changes took place on
IBM's
> end.  Now that it's working, it's great.
>
> If you want to know what the router/firewall settings are, I will have to
> contact The Router Guy because I don't know.
>
> -- 
> Jeff Crosby
> Dilgard Frozen Foods, Inc.
> P.O. Box 13369
> Ft. Wayne, IN 46868-3369
> 260-422-7531
>
> The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily the opinion of my
> company.  Unless I say so.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.