|
Personally, if I had the drive space to spare, I'd go with 100% mirroring, rather than parity groups, the way we do on our most critical (and most drive-failure-prone) systems, here at Touchtone. That way, to lose anything, we'd have to lose both drives of a mirrored pair, over a span of less time than it would take to recognize the problem, swap in a replacement, and re-establish mirroring. Failing that (no pun intended), I'd go with more, smaller, parity groups, just to make them more resistant to multiple drive failures. With a single group of six drives, any 2-drive failure would shut you down, while with two groups of three, you would have to lose two in the same parity group, which is statistically less likely. -- JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.