RE: Level Check

["Kern, Mary T" <MKern4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The files are not fully qualified in the program ... It relies on *LIBL

¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥« 
Mary Kern 
Director of Information Services 
University of Toledo Foundation 
2801 W Bancroft St Mail Stop 319
Toledo, OH 43606
Voice: (419) 530-7730 (800) 640-0147 
Fax: 419-530-2895 
Email: Mary.kern4@xxxxxxxxxxx
Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men
trying to find easier ways to do something. 
       Robert Heinlein (1907 - 1988), Time Enough For Love
¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥« 


-----Original Message-----
From: michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 3:30 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Level Check


It wouldn't generate a level check if the format identifiers were the same. 
Also, I wonder if fully qualifying a file reference would make a difference in 
level check processing? Bet it would...that can also be an issue in service 
programs.

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:18:59 -0500, "Kern, Mary T" <MKern4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
said:
> I agree that it is wrong.  I am pretty sure that IBM did not 
> misunderstand me.  He said definitely a program compiled over testdata 
> will not look at the proddata file for a level check AND since I was 
> running it over proddata, the program would not even check the file 
> over which it was compiled.
> 
> But I am here to tell you ... it happened. I did not get a level check 
> and I can reproduce it.
> 
> ¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«
> Mary Kern 
> Director of Information Services 
> University of Toledo Foundation 
> 2801 W Bancroft St Mail Stop 319
> Toledo, OH 43606
> Voice: (419) 530-7730 (800) 640-0147 
> Fax: 419-530-2895 
> Email: Mary.kern4@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Progress isn't made by early risers. It's made by lazy men
> trying to find easier ways to do something. 
>        Robert Heinlein (1907 - 1988), Time Enough For Love
> ¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥« 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Gibbs [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 1:57 PM
> To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Level Check
> 
> 
> Kern, Mary T wrote:
> > IBM support line tells me that a program doesn't know anything about
> > any file except the one over which it was compiled.  If a program is 
> > compiled over files in TESTDATA and the program is run over files in 
> > PRODDATA, it cannot do a level check.  And it won't even check the 
> > files in TESTDATA to see if they match.
> 
> Um, that's completely wrong.
> 
> If a program is compiled over a file in TESTDATA and then run with a
> file in PRODDATA, then it will check the format level identifier of the 
> file it was compiled with against the one it is running with.
> 
> If the level identifiers don't match, the program will fail (unless it
> was instructed to ignore level checks).
> 
> So long as the file in TESTDATA and PRODDATA have the same format 
> level
> identifier, the program will work fine.
> 
> david
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
> list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
-- 
  
  michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
                          unladen european swallow