RE: Losing Authority to a file in Batch

["John Earl" <john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> well.... would it be any diff if C:\>rmtcmd //gdisys call
> pgmxxx
> and pgmxxx is compiled to *owner.

Yes - a big difference - pgmxxx typically has a scoped set of work that
a user can do such as "add a record" or Maintain Customer Info", or some
such thing. and _within_the_context_of_that_program's_instructions_, the
user is allowed to read or change data to the referenced files.

Otherwise, at the rmtcmd prompt, the user is authorized to run any
command that they (or *PUBLIC) is authorized to, and execute that
command against any file that the user (or *PUBLIC) is authorized to.
That's a huge difference.  

Adopted authority allows you to scope a user's access to a file - the
scope being the set of instructions that are already compiled into the
adopted authority program.

jte

--
John Earl | Chief Technology Officer
The PowerTech Group
19426 68th Ave. S
Seattle, WA 98032
(253) 872-7788 ext. 302
john.earl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.powertech.com 
 

 
This email message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
the intended recipients and may contain information that is privileged
and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any
dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you
received this email message in error, please immediately notify the
sender by replying to this email message, or by telephone, and delete
the message from your email system.
--