RE: Terminating an idle batch job -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Terminating an idle batch job
From: "Pete Helgren" <pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:28:41 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

This may be a fairly obvious and therefore, completely idiotic answer but,
if the jobs have a MSGW status that usually means that there was an error or
it is waiting for a specific operator response.  Why not just use the
command DSPMSG QSYSOPR and answer them?

I also vaguely remember some way to automatically answer some messages but
that could go back years....

Pete Helgren
Timpanogos Technologies, Inc

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.