|
In reviewing one of the old systems I am responsible for, I noticed that some 17.54gb disk units were added onto the system (as ASP 3) and are in an unprotected state. I think if we had added 4gb disk units in these locations, we simply could have added them to the existing parity set, but since they are 17.54gb they can't be added. Is this correct? Size % I/O Request Read Write Read Write % --Protection-- Unit Type (M) Used Rqs Size (K) Rqs Rqs (K) (K) Busy ASP Type Status 1 6607 4194 84.8 .5 10.3 .3 .2 12.5 6.7 0 1 DPY ACTIVE 2 6607 3670 84.7 .5 15.3 .3 .2 18.6 11.4 0 1 DPY ACTIVE 3 6607 3670 84.7 .5 18.2 .2 .2 24.0 10.9 0 1 DPY ACTIVE 4 6607 3670 85.0 .5 11.7 .3 .2 17.2 4.9 0 1 DPY ACTIVE 17 6607 3145 23.8 .0 5.4 .0 .0 4.0 5.9 0 2 DPY ACTIVE <snip> 23 6714 17548 18.6 .1 56.9 .1 .0 66.8 37.4 0 3 24 6714 17548 18.6 .2 67.6 .1 .0 76.6 50.2 0 3 What could I expect if we lost either drive 23 or 24? Can the system ride out the loss of a user ASP? If not, and it crashes, when the failed disk is replaced and the system is brought back up, is there any data loss in the ASPs that *are* RAID protected? (This is a V4R4 system). Scott Lindstrom
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.