|
I take it as part of the "performance" of the OS you expect from Solaris and iSeries is due to the hardware also. If you are ok with the performance of low end commodity hardware, it is typically more cost efficient to go a different OS route. ----- Original Message ----- From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:52 PM Subject: RE: OS/400 on a Sun unix > | The example of Solaris on Intel shows that putting a big time OS on a > | commodity architecture may not give the results a company hopes for. > > I guess I don't get this statement, given that both Windows and Linux run on > commodity architecture.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.