× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Brad Stone wrote:
Actually, porting OS400 to other platforms would be the
best move that IBM would make, as long as they didn't
charge 20k for a license (maybe 500 bucks or so at the
most).


Even porting to mac would be great (and a reason for me to
buy one).  I believe the mac and as/400's hardware
(processor) are similar.


It shouldn't be difficult to understand why that ain't gonna happen anytime soon. For one reason, OS/400 is simply tied too much to a specific hardware platform. Sure, the processor used in current Mac's is similar to the AS/400's CPU, but AFAIK, it's not quite the same.


The big issue, of course, is the single level store. Some say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. Well, in case you haven't noticed, ever since CPF was released 25 years ago, not a lot of other computer manufacturers have been flattering IBM. Single level store is still very much an oddity in the realm of computer architectures, and probably the biggest bottleneck in any attempt to port OS/400 to any other platform.

Cheers! Hans



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.