RE: MONMSG CPF2103 but still "unmonitored", causing halt

[G Armour <garmour400m@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, *how* would I detect this particular problem?  I have since replaced
the CPF2102 with a MONMSG CPF9999 after the others.  It appears that the
CPF9999 message tattles on the CPF2102.  Can I interrogate the CPF9999
message to make sure that it was caused by CPF2102?

TIA, GA

--- "Chevalier, Rick" <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Message CPF2102 is not monitorable from DSPPGMREF.  Prompt the command,
> move the cursor to the heading and press F1.  Scroll down until you see
> the monitorable error messages.
> 
> The CPF3033 and CPF3034 messages are monitorable however.  That makes me
> think what you are seeing is the expected behavior.  CPF2102 is caught
> by the IBM program which then issues a message monitorable by your CL.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: G Armour [mailto:garmour400m@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:13 AM
> > To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: MONMSG CPF2103 but still "unmonitored", causing halt
> > 
> > 
> > Never seen this one before.  Performing DSPPGMREF on program 
> > objects to an
> > outfile and getting CPF2103 on several objects in the system. 
> >  The program
> > objects appear to be undamaged; the few I've checked are old, user
> > application, CL programs.  One I looked at via DSPOBJD has no 
> > values for
> > "Created by user" and "System created on", but it is an object that is
> > being used, apparently with no execution errors.  This may be 
> > a clue:  It
> > was compiled at V1R2M0 and can run on V1R1M0.  Further 
> > testing shows that
> > all of the several objects that cause this error have a 
> > system version of
> > V1R2M0 or V1R3M0.  However, note that there are hundreds of 
> > such objects
> > on the system that do NOT cause the error.  Here is the test code I'm
> > running that duplicates the problem:
> > 
> >    DspPgmRef  Pgm( CUSWW/WWEPG1* ) Output( *OutFile ) +
> >                 ObjType( *PGM ) +
> >                 OutFile( GBAlibSysF/$DspPgmRfO ) +  
> >                 OutMbr( *First *Add )
> >      MonMsg     CPF2102  /* Invalid Object Type */ 
> >      MonMsg     CPF3034  /* Object cannot be displayed (locked) */
> >      MonMsg     CPF3033  /* Object no longer exists */
> > 
> > Even though I am monitoring for CPF2102, I'm still getting an 
> > exception
> > requiring a response, being told that CPF2102 is unmonitored:
> > 
> >     1100 - DSPPGMREF PGM(CUSWW/WWEPG1*) OUTPUT(*OUTFILE) OBJTYPE(*PGM)
> >     OUTFILE(GBALIBSYSF/$DSPPGMRFO) OUTMBR(*FIRST *ADD)        
> >            
> >   Object type and subtype code 'C740'X not valid.             
> >            
> >   15 records added to member $DSPPGMRFO in file $DSPPGMRFO in 
> > GBALIBSYSF.
> >   Function check. CPF2102 unmonitored by QWHDSPPR at 
> > statement *N,       
> >     instruction X'0212'.                                      
> >            
> >   CPF9999 received by DSPPGRFOBZ at 1100. (C D I R)           
> >            
> > 
> > (The first message, with the 'C740'X, is the CPF2102 
> > message.)  The one
> > thing that caught my eye is that function check message is saying that
> > CPF2102 is unmonitored by ***QWHDSPPR***, and not by my 
> > program.  Is that
> > the expected behavior?
> > 
> > TIA, GA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com