|
> From: Jon Paris > > b) is the major problem. IBM might make more iSeries _hardware_ revenue > but > because we all keep demanding more horsepower for the buck that would > nowhere near compensate for the revenue lost in services. Look where the > bulk of the profit comes from. It's from services, not hardware. I don't get this argument. What "lost revenue"? Show me a simple hypothetical calculation showing how revenue is lost when more iSeries boxes are sold. I don't care if the numbers are dead-accurate, just show me how more hardware sales = less revenue for IBM. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.