Re: Questions on RCVJRNE and exit program -- MIDRANGE-L

GA,
If you are still interested,
We have put some code snippets on our website using  RCVJRNE on remote
journals .

http://www.abvv.be/code/en/fram099.htm

luc


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Ken.Slaugh@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: Questions on RCVJRNE and exit program


>
> The RCVJRNE command itself is quite efficient. Since you haven't described
> what your exit program will be doing with the journal receiver entries,
> then the answer is gonna be rather vague as well.
>
> We have a number different processes using journal receiver entries and
> processing them in batch is quite controllable with the use of RUNPTY and
> TimeSlice settings.
>
> Another nice application is to invoke remote journals... Having a second
> 400 process the journal receiver entries off-loads the RCVJRNE command
> altogether.
>
> Good luck, you're on the right track since the files are already being
> journalled. No need to impact the I/O with triggers at this point.
>
> Ken Slaugh (707) 795-1512 x118
> Chouinard & Myhre, Inc.
> CA/400 Certified Specialist
> iSeries Network/MSE Administrator
> http://www.cm-inc.com/
>
>
>
>                       G Armour
>                       <garmour400m@xxxxxxx        To:
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>                       om>                         cc:
>                       Sent by:                    Subject:  Questions on
RCVJRNE and exit program
>                       midrange-l-bounces@m
>                       idrange.com
>
>
>                       08/25/2003 12:27 PM
>                       Please respond to
>                       Midrange Systems
>                       Technical Discussion
>
>
>
>
>
>
> It appears that RCVJRNE is going to solve a dilemma for us very nicely.
> However, before we go headlong into it, we'd like to have an idea as to
> the additional overhead and whether user response may be impacted.
> Currently, the system on which we are considering doing this has thousands
> of users.  Apparently, user response time is nearing an unacceptable
> threshold.  I know this is vague, but is all I was given for the time
> being.  So this will be difficult, if not impossible, for us to test in
> our development environment of ten users on a more than ample system.  The
> file which we want to do a RCVJRNE is *already* being journaled; so the
> "additional impact", as I see it, is strictly whatever the RCVJRNE & exit
> program is doing.
>
> Before anyone asks, using a trigger program is out of the question, since
> triggers are already in use for the file and we are not being allowed to
> change them.
>
> TIA, GA
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>