RE: WDSC

["Mark Phippard" <MarkP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That about sums it up.  Just to be sure I wasn't exaggerating, I just 
closed and restart it.  It took 4 seconds to start (probably because it 
had already been open).

I have a very fast PC with a ton of RAM so you might not get exactly the 
same results, but 5.0 takes almost a minute to start on the same system. 
Although when I just did the same test with 5.0 it took about 15 seconds 
to start the second time I opened it.

Mark





"Scott Johnson" <sjohnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
09/09/2003 01:38 PM
Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
 
        To:     "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" 
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Subject:        RE: WDSC


In a word:  WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces+sjohnson=highsmith.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces+sjohnson=highsmith.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> ]On Behalf
> Of Mark Phippard
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:16 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: RE: WDSC
<SNIP>
> For example, the IDE starts in about 5-8 seconds on my machine instead 
of
45-60 seconds with 5.0.
>
<SNIP>
> Mark
>
>


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.