|
Absolutely. Adopted user is the owner, who has *ALLOBJ *IOSYSCFG *JOBCTL *SAVSYS *SECADM *SERVICE *SPLCTL -----Original Message----- From: MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:MWalter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:43 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: CPF2207 Does adopted user have authority to CLROUTQ Command? Thanks, Mark Mark D. Walter Senior Programmer/Analyst CCX, Inc. mwalter@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.ccxinc.com "Burns, Bryan" <burnsbm@Echoincorpor To: "'MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ated.com> cc: Sent by: Subject: CPF2207 midrange-l-bounces@mi drange.com 08/29/2003 09:24 AM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion User is running a batch job and getting a CPF2207 (not authorized to outq) at a statement that says CLROUTQ OUTQ(ABROUT). Authority to outq for *PUBLIC was *USE, changed to *CHANGE, that did not work. Gave USER *ALL authority to the outq, that did not work either. Gave *PUBLIC *ALL and that did not work. Gave USRPRF *ALLOBJ special authority and did a R (retry) on the job and that did not work either! PGM uses adopted authority and owner of the pgm also owns the outq. Owner has *ALLOBJ special authority among many others. Program runs fine when owner of pgm runs it. What is wrong here?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.