|
--- Tom Liotta <qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Don: > > Ummm... what? It moots the 1 iSeries server point??? > Consider -- isn't this almost exactly what the point > of LPAR really is? > > Consider, for example, running Linux in an LPAR to > provide the separation. Yes, I agree that an LPAR may be the solution. If the solution would be for a single iSeries server being an Intranet solution and an LPAR'd iSeries being an Internet solution, then both scenarios are accomplished with one box. If viable, IBM should really be hammering this. Don McIntyre __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
