|
And even more amazing than that is we just went through a "consolidation" of IBM User ID's, what, late last year ? So I try my "new" all-in-one ID and guess what ? It is invalid ! Hello IBM ? Chuck Chuck Lewis Manager of I.T. Lee Supply Corp. Indianapolis, IN -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces+clewis=iquest.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces+clewis=iquest.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pete Hall Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:27 PM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: OS/400 Vulnerability to CERT Advisories Yeah. I shudder every time I need to come up with an IBM customer number. There always seems to be about a dozen of them, some of which work. I can never keep it straight. This information should be available to the public. A login ID is OK, as long as it's free, but why the customer ID and the double approval process? Next we'll need to provide a urine sample... At 17:45 07/28/2003, Doug Hart wrote: >This would be great if only I didn't need to be Houdini to get logged in. >What's so secret that I need to login for this information? Pete Hall pbhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.pbhall.us/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.