|
One has to be careful of such statistics.
Last week, one of my stocks went down in price. I had paid
$12.50/share.... the price had gone up to $20/share over time... and now
it's dropped to something less than $18. I could argue successfully that
I'd lost $2 for each share that I held when the price dropped. But in
truth, it's still a gain of just under 50% of the investment. So it's a
matter of perspective, isn't it?
Some companies budget for $X in sales.... and when they receive $Y in
sales, (where Y < X, ), they say the lost X-Y dollars. It's all
perspective.
If a company is billions in debt, however, that's a different matter
entirely. Just ask the creditors; they'll tell you! :)
Dennis
"Chuck Lewis"
<clewis@xxxxxxxxxx> To: "'Midrange Systems
Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cc:
midrange-l-bounces@x Subject: RE: AOL CD's
idrange.com
06/16/2003 09:25 AM
Please respond to
Midrange Systems
Technical Discussion
Of course this should be moving to the Non-Tech list :-) I don't disagree
with you Ken, but a mere "billions" ? I heard on a business news show this
weekend that Ford had lost 6.4 billion in the last TWO YEARS !
Chuck
Ken wrote:
<Thee question is not their cd's, it should be how a company like Time
Warner Inc, can be so far in the whole (Billions) and still operate...?
Boggles my mind...>
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.