|
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Andy Nolen-Parkhouse wrote: > > There really are only two things to do. First, you can find a way to > > decrease the interactive workload by scheduling your work differently or > > finding the user who is running batch jobs interactively. If you have > > programmers who do interactive compiles for instance. The second option > > is to purchase additional interactive capacity, which can be very > > expensive. > > There are more than two things to do, one is fast/400 and another is > change platforms. Those last two options may not be desireable, however. > what an interesting thought, James, fast400 might help keep people on the platform and thus be good for the AS/400 community at large.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.