|
Yea what a pain. If you run your applications bound to * or all interfaces, you have no way of controlling what interface is used at time of establishing an outbound connection. If you create a virtual IP and add routes for each of the Physical connection and bind your client application to the Virtual IP you will always know the outbound IP and don't care about the route, (interface), taken. Unfortunately you cannot force IBM Client Applications such as Telnet to use only the Virtual IP, UNLESS you define IP Security Policies and lock down the physical IPs to restrict all access. The easiest thing to do is to add all three IP address to the reverse lookup tables on your DNS server. Chris Bipes -----Original Message----- From: Jerome Draper It appears that the model 830 at V5R1 has mysteriously switched ethernet interfaces that are used for outbound network connections. I cannot seem to find any failure in qhst or qsysopr msgq. We have three ethernet adapters in this AS400 all running TCP/IP. The default gateway (172.16.1.1) is in the same subnet as two of them (172.16.1.10 and 172.16.1.13). The first one, 172.16.1.10, up until now, had been used for outbound network connections. Now or all of the sudden the AS400 has started using the other adapter 172.16.1.13. Why? How could this be? The fully qualified domain name is (now?) tied to the 172.16.1.13 adapter. How could this have changed and where would I find evidence of when and why this happened? Nothing in qhst or qsysopr msgq.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.