RE: Missing JRN Receiver Entries

In your original posting, you stated that you were "assuming the journal
is missing record insert, update or deletes since
the target of these receivers fails to mirror the database correctly."
You've also noted that the missing entries seem to appear just before a
JRNRCV is replaced. Seems to me that two and two go together, the
missing entry is a system entry that the receiver is about to change.
What do you mean, exactly, by "mirror the database correctly?" Are you
manually comparing the collective results of the receiver entries to the
eventual data within the table? Or are you talking about some sort of
remote journaling that keeps a backup system in sync? Perhaps you could
take this file, make a second copy, process a bunch of changes against
it until you see this problem of a missing entry occur, apply the
journaled changes to the copied file, then compare the two files.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken.Slaugh@xxxxxxxxxx
> 
> If this were true then I wouldn't be missing physical file updates.
> 
> As a side note.... I don't have missing sequence numbers on 
> our test system
> and I'm assuming that is because there is less traffic to journal.
NOTICE: This E-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not
the addressee or the intended recipient please do not read this E-mail
and please immediately delete this e-mail message and any attachments
from your workstation or network mail system. If you are the addressee
or the intended recipient and you save or print a copy of this E-mail,
please place it in an appropriate file, depending on whether
confidential information is contained in the message.