Re: Did IBM Hijack Apache????

Yes, they would have to be under the rules of the GPL.  Well, they could
change them for their own internal use, but if the distributed, they would
have to release the code.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Richter" <srichter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject: RE: Did IBM Hijack Apache????


> are all of the ibm changes open source?
>
> thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Shannon O'Donnell
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:31 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Did IBM Hijack Apache????
>
>
> I remember that IBM made several DB2/Apache enhancements and also
> enhancements to work/recognize OS/400 security and for Apache to recognize
> all or part of QSYS.LIB file system.  Don't remember all the details as
it's
> been a year or more since I looked into this.  There is a document
floating
> around on IBM's website on this.  You'll have to dig a bit to find it but
> it's there and it contains some fairly detailed info on just what they
did.
>
> If you're really interested, I could try to find the information I have.
>
> Shannon O'Donnell
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jt" <jt@xxxxxx>
> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 12:21 PM
> Subject: RE: Did IBM Hijack Apache????
>
>
> > | -----Original Message-----
> > | [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Shields, Ken
> >
> > | and out systems
> > | programmer, seemed to be making continual twigs to the
> > | CICS command system. Occasionally, he made the mistake, of
> > | printing the compile listing...LOL
> >
> >
> >
> > | -----Original Message-----
> > | From: David Gibbs [mailto:david@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >
> > | At 03:28 PM 4/24/2003, you wrote:
> > | >It is impossible to hijack it.  For starters, the work IBM is paying
> > | >developers to do, goes right back in the pool.
> > |
> > | Has anyone reviewed the modifications IBM made to make Apache run on
an
> > | iSeries?
> > |
> > | Is it possible to recompile Apache on an iSeries after making your own
> > | modifications?
> >
> > Hahaha...;-D
> >
> > I looked at it a li'l when Apache 2.0 came out (year-and-a-half ago?).
> > Don't know details, but recall it mainly had-ta do with security
> > enhancements.
> >
> > Dunno much about second question...  Assume if enhancements are done
> "under
> > the covers" rather than to the core, then recompile of changes would
work
> > okay. (?)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
> > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.