× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



It is impossible to hijack it.  For starters, the work IBM is paying
developers to do, goes right back in the pool.

Second, so what if IBM is telling their own employees what to work on.  It
is their right.  If people think something else is a more important
component to work on, nothing is stopping them from working on it.

People bitch for the sake of bitching.   They cried to be taken seriously by
corporations and now they cry to be left alone.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shields, Ken" <kenshields@xxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 4:13 PM
Subject: RE: Did IBM Hijack Apache????


> Seems to me the small project groups within 'Open Source', leave
themselves open, to just that kind of activity.
> If the groups work was always mandated as belonging to the 'Open Source'
world, and no large corporation could
> buy into it, these kinds of activities wouldn't happen.
> How then can someone use the term 'hijack'?
> money talks and B$#@@&^%  walks...
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Shaw [mailto:mhshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 3:59 PM
> To: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Did IBM Hijack Apache????
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Bob Cringly's weekly column was just posted on the pbs web site.  He
> basically states that IBM hijacked Apache from Open Source.........
>
> "It is possible to hijack an Open Source project since any Open Source
> team will automatically bend itself around the party doing the most
> work. What I find most interesting, however, is applying varying motives
> to the hijacking. What if Microsoft, for example, suddenly started
> devoting a lot of resources to Open Source development? They could throw
> a team at all the key projects. But why would they do that? Well, IBM is
> already doing it. IBM has hired most of the Apache team. IBM has some
> major pull on what work gets done and does not get done. In some cases,
> it is frustrating, and other cases not. However, everybody just accepts
> it because IBM is paying the bills and people can do what they love. Is
> there an official IBM party line at Apache? Absolutely not! It is just
> that none of the Apache developers will talk negatively about IBM, even
> those that do not work at IBM. So in this sense, it already appears that
> Apache has been hijacked."
>
> Full article URL:
>
> http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20030424.html
>
> That a pretty bold statement!
>
> Regards,
>
> Mike Shaw
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.