Re: CPF3281

["Carel Teijgeler" <coteijgeler@xxxxxxxxx>]

Bill,

it seems IIM@ is an LF, base on a PF ( IPI100IM ?) that has not been restored 
yet. Restores are done alphabetically.

Regards,
Carel Teijgeler


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 3-4-03 at 15:45 Bill wrote:

>Looking at my long restore process, I'm noticing a lot of CPF3281's. 
>When I display the message, it doesn't make much sense since as far as I
>can see both reasons 1 and 2 say the same thing:
>                                                                          
>     
> Message ID . . . . . . :   CPF3281                                       
>     
> Date sent  . . . . . . :   04/03/03      Time sent  . . . . . . :  
>15:39:50   
>                                                                          
>     
> Message . . . . :   New format IPI100IM created for file IIM@x           
>     
>                                                                          
>     
> Cause . . . . . :   File IIM@ was restored into library BPCSCDSTDF.
>However, a 
>   new format IPI100IM was created for the file because sharing of format 
>     
>   IPI100IM with file IIM@ in library BPCSCDSTDF could not be established 
>     
>   again. Either:                                                         
>     
>     1) File IIM@ in library BPCSCDSTDF using format IPI100IM with a
>correct    
>   format level identifier does not exist, or                             
>     
>     2) File IIM@ in library BPCSCDSTDF using format IPI100IM with a
>correct    
>   format level identifier does not exist.                                
>     
>
>Can anyone translate this for me?