× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. March 2003

Re: Aldon stuff

"E Doc" <doc6502@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20030325151258.52195.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Why do you need to remove the binding directory entry?  The binding
> >directory is just that, a directory (unless I've misunderstood your
> >requirement).
> The main reason is that we'll be re-deploying these apps in different
> configurations to different branches.  As such, the order of the objects
in the
> binding directory may change.

Ok, I'm kind of confused here ... if you want the binding directories
managed by your SCM product, then you apparently want a standardized binding
directory ... but you also state that you want the apps bound in different
configurations for each location?

How and why are you using binding directories to control configuration
options?  Wouldn't it be better to use program control?

I think there's something I am missing here.

david

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.