RE: re I love my 400

Yes Buck,  PTFs fixed the problems. At the time I was on the latest cumes.
>From memory SI06871 fixed the problem.  We have just loaded cume 3007 and I
hope a problem with DLCOBJ goes away.  This is code that has worked for
years
and even now it works most of the time.  Every now and then it looks like a
lock
is not removed by DLCOBJ.  I try to defer going to the latest OS400 release
to
avoid issues but if everyone did that no one would upgrade. I have enough
problems
of my own making so when system issues occur it gets a bit much. OS400
stability
is legendary but if you get close to the 'bleeding edge' it hurts.  IBM
also tries to get
users onto the latest release but I have been bit too often to go
willingly.

Anyway, nuff said.
Frank Kolmann
******** Reply separator ***********
date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:30:38 -0500
from: Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>Obviously you arnt on V5R1 yet. (just guessing)
>The issues I have had with SQL on this release are making
>my hair fall out. (whts left of it.)

I haven't encountered any issues with SQL on V5R1.  Our software uses a
bunch of stored procedures, and I'm pretty sure one of our customers would
have complained if something was awry.  Are you up to date on the database
group PTFs?
  --buck