× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2003

RE: Database Access Path Question

But you can Input Primary on the LF /w DYNSLT and get rid of the keyed input
necessary with READE.  Blocking will be used and the program will process
faster.  Now if you only have a small number of records in your sub-set,
READE is just fine and much more flexible.  So once again it depends on the
application and data base.

Chris Bipes

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Tuohy [mailto:tuohyp@attglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 2:02 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Database Access Path Question


Not quite sure I follow, Chris. If you use the READE method, then the 
DYNSLT is redundant - actually, I think it would get in the way!

Paul

Chris Bipes wrote:
> Awh but DYNSLT and the field as the first key would fly.
> 
> Chris Bipes

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.