RE: Reducing Systempools

["Segars, Steven " <Steven_Segars@xxxxxxx>]

With batch and interactive together, I'm surprised you dont have performance
problems. But each system is different I guess. Either way, If it were me, I
would seperate your batch processing, since you say its a heavy load. What
are your page faults looking like? Currently your at 81% ASP used, so try to
clean up any spool files you no longer need or performance data, history
logs. I dont know your maintenance window so just do what you can.

-----Original Message-----
From: oliver.wenzel@cibavision.novartis.com
[mailto:oliver.wenzel@cibavision.novartis.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:48 AM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Reducing Systempools


Hello,

I'm currently looking at reducing our memory pools. We currently have the
following wrksyssts:

                                                             30.01.03
16:51:08
 % CPU used . . . . . . . :       34,9    System ASP . . . . . . . :
193,0 G
 % DB capability  . . . . :       18,6    % system ASP used  . . . :
81,7213
 Elapsed time . . . . . . :   00:04:07    Total aux stg  . . . . . :
210,5 G
 Jobs in system . . . . . :      12673    Current unprotect used . :
4507 M
 % perm addresses . . . . :      0,024    Maximum unprotect  . . . :
5890 M
 % temp addresses . . . . :      0,735
 Sys      Pool   Reserved    Max
Paging
 Pool    Size M   Size M     Act  Pool        Subsystem   Library
Option
   1     598,97    193,16  +++++  *MACHINE
*FIXED
   2    1345,82      0,33    137  *BASE
*FIXED
   3     250,00      0,00     15  *SPOOL
*FIXED
   4      25,92      0,00      1   2          MSGCTL      CV00C00
*FIXED
   5     330,40      0,00     20   2          AUFTRAG     CV00C00
*FIXED
   6     120,86      0,00     10   2          IT          CV00C00
*FIXED
   7      50,00      0,00      5   2          GCINTER     CV00C00
*FIXED
   8     330,00      0,00     20   2          AUFTRAGWJ   CV00C00
*FIXED
  10      20,00      0,00     10   2          RPSBSW130   SYLASW130
*FIXED

Bottom

Can I just shift everything to *BASE or will this get me problems? We have
heavy batch-processing, should I put
these into a different pool? Or generally seperate batch from interactive?

Currently, we have no performance problems, but I want to cleanup.

Thanks,

OLiver



_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.