Re: Why not *SHRPOOL1?

[rob@xxxxxxxxx]

By the way, my boss did like the recommendation of:

>Now it IS possible to change shared pools so they have a minimum size, 
using WRKSHRPOOL (F11). So  you could reserve a certain percentage of main 

memory, even if a subsystem becomes relatively inactive.
=That would seem like a waste of memory - tying it up when it could be 
better utilized elsewhere.  Unless you want to avoid the QPFRADJ delay 
when the load switches.  This is why we were thinking of lowering the 
number of pools.

And he has adjusted our shared pools like the following (while we are 
still mulling over combining pools):

                      -----Size %----- 
Pool        Priority  Minimum  Maximum 
*MACHINE         1      6.13      100 
*BASE            1      5.46      100 
*INTERACT        2     10.00      100 
*SPOOL           2      1.00      100 
*SHRPOOL1        2     10.00      100 

*INTERACT and *SHRPOOL1 were set to 5.00

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin