RE: QRPGSRC vs. QRPGLESRC

["Malchow, Grizzly" <GMalchow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I brought that up to my boss and the that idea didn't fly. My boss only wants 
to do the RPG programs. 

-----Original Message-----
From: MCPARTLAND, Stan [mailto:stanley.mcpartland@bently.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:34 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: QRPGSRC vs. QRPGLESRC


I recommend keeping all of your source (RPG, RPGLE, CL, CLLE, DDS, ...) in a 
single source file.  Current tools work much better with a single source file.  
Source files separated by source type is a hold over from the System/38's 
programmer's menu which automatically switched source file depending on the 
source type you were processing.

Regards,
Stan

-----Original Message-----
From: Malchow, Grizzly [mailto:GMalchow@automaticproducts.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 21 January, 2003 7:18 AM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: QRPGSRC vs. QRPGLESRC


I'm supposed to create a source file named QRPGSRC that will be hold all of 
source files, both RPG and RPGILE. I've always kept the 2 source members in 
seperate source files. I.E. QRPGSRC and QRPGLESRC. I know QRPGLESRC has a 
longer record length. I'm supposed to create a QRPGSRC with a record lenght of 
112. Everywhere I've been before has always kept the sources seperate. I don't 
think it's necesarily a good idea. I need a good reason to explain why we 
should not do this, other than industry standards, the differences in the code 
etc. _______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To 
post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or 
change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.