PASE vs simplicity -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: PASE vs simplicity
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:12:51 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Indiana (at least most of it) doesn't change times.  Evidently PASE cannot 
handle this simplicity.  IBM's answer to a TSM issue is the following:
ADDENVVAR ENVVAR(PASE_TZ) VALUE('EST5EDT') LEVEL(*SYS)

and when the time changes change it to 'CST6CDT'.

I don't suppose there is some 'EST#EST' value, is there?

Rob Berendt
-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
Benjamin Franklin

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.