RE: 25GB tape -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Yes - use the > and >> from tape stats in SST or PRTERRLOG *VOLSTAT
They take into account the type of tape drive and whether or not high
temporary errors are "normal" for that format.

...Neil





rob@dekko.com
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
2002/12/26 09:15
Please respond to midrange-l


        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Subject:        RE: 25GB tape


Then what do we use to determine if the tape and/or the drive needs work?
The > or the >> on the tape stats?

Anyone else know where these stats are?

Rob Berendt
--





neilp@dpslink.com
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
12/25/2002 12:16 AM
Please respond to midrange-l

        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Fax to:
        Subject:        RE: 25GB tape


Tape error stats on different types of drives can not be directly
compared.  Some drive types report very high temporary errors (QIC, 8mm),
but the error correction capabilities take care of that.  There was a
document I saw from IBM a few years ago listing what were acceptable
temporary error rates for different drive types, but I can't locate it
right now.

...Neil

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.