|
-- -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] get a lawyer. This is smacking of extortion. I missed the part about this being a temporary job anyway.. This is sounding like your current employer intends to extort the client. Very bad, very bad. --------------------------------------------------------- Booth Martin http://www.MartinVT.com Booth@MartinVT.com --------------------------------------------------------- -------Original Message------- From: midrange-l@midrange.com Date: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 02:46:49 PM To: midrange-l@midrange.com Subject: Re: "Prior Inventions" on employment contract Nathan, I can't even get my employer to modify just one word of this contract. Let alone the two of us working together to create one. In a previous employment situation, I was given a non-compete agreement to sign after I started working. I took it home to look over, and it was a classic. Like, "any one we've ever talked to or hope to talk to, whether they exist or not..." crap. I ignored it and never brought it up. They never bothered me about it. This employer is not letting me ignore this one. If they threaten me, then I will give them an Exhibit "B" (Prior Inventions) of the likes that they've never seen before. Fact 1: I am not in a position where I can walk away from this job. Fact 2: I would just as soon leave all my utilities off the client's system while I belong to my employer. I'm scheduled to be hired by the client in a few months anyway, so it would not be a great loss. I may even mention it to the client and say that I'm hamstrung by the employer, can't use these tools that help me do my job better and faster, so I'll just have to plod along. That has a high potential to backfire, though, so if it comes right down to it, I'll probably just go without my utilities for the next few months. - Dan --- "Nathan M. Andelin" <nandelin@RELATIONAL-DATA.COM> wrote: > One sided contracts are not "agreements", they're policies. My > advise would > be rewrite the contract to be more balanced. The best contracts are > those > that consider the needs of the employee as well as the employer. > > For example, consider terms that would protect your interest in any > of your > creations - whether they be developed before, during, or after > employment. > You might be surprised at how reasonable an employer can be. > > Just ask for what you need. For example, I personally don't do > "works made > for hire" - which give all intellectual property rights to the other > guy. > > Nathan M. Andelin > www.relational-data.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. . -- [ IMSTP.gif of type image/gif deleted ] --
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.