|
A cheap copy of IBM/360 but with special emphasis on interactive work. Great little machine. Better than AS/400 (ducking) in user friendliness. ----- Original Message ----- From: Charly Jones <charly301@hotmail.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:23 AM Subject: Re: v5r2 >>Anyone aware of Wang's history knows that I am glad we did. What is a Wang? -- Charly >From "Programmers at Work" by Microsoft Press: Interviewer: "Is studying computer science the best way to prepare to be a programmer?" Bill Gates: "No, the best way to prepare is to write programs, and to study great programs that other people have written. In my case, I went to the garbage cans at the Computer Science Center and I fished out listings of their operating system." Charly Jones 253 265-6244 Box 640 Gig Harbor Washington USA 98335 >From: "Roger Vicker, CCP" <rvicker@vicker.com> >Reply-To: midrange-l@midrange.com >To: midrange-l@midrange.com >Subject: Re: v5r2 >Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:20:38 -0600 > >Rob, > >I had an IBMer tell me that some of their high capacity printers actually >work >better with a twinax interface than TCP/IP. He said that if he had a choice >he >would use twinax for any rough environment like a shipping dock. > >Now me, the only thing I use twinax for is the system console. Will until >IBM >gets a lan based console that is proven as solid and functional. > >Roger Vicker, CCP > >rob@dekko.com wrote: > > > This is a multipart message in MIME format. > > -- > > [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] > > If that is the case, then convert your PC's from twinax to LAN. It's a > > rare business that is thriving that is not running a lan, so you >probably > > have one anyway. > > > > Back when the AS/400 first came out and we were planning the move, a >boss > > thought we should evaluate other platforms, like Wang. At that time we > > had over $250,000 in twinax perephials alone. For that reason, and > > numerous others, I thought we should ditch the move and just go to the > > 400. Anyone aware of Wang's history knows that I am glad we did. But > > now, our usage of twinax terminals is extremely limited. With the low > > cost of netstations or PC's I can't see a reason to put in twinax > > anywhere. Including dirty shop floor. Oh, there will be people who > > disagree, and they will continue to cite reasons of durability, ease of > > use, security, ease of setup, etc even past the day the last one rolls >out > > the door at their company. > > > > Rob Berendt > > _________________________________________________________________ Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.