× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. November 2002

Re: SQL and V5R1

Bill

AFAIK, these have not changed. I looked in the V5R1 manuals for change
indications - none in regards to these. SQLSTT (SQLSTATE) is based on
ANSI/ISO standards, anyway.

But I didn't look everywhere.

Vern

At 08:40 AM 11/1/02 -0500, you wrote:

I realize that this may be old news (since V5R2 is out) but I've just been
told that in V5R1 IBM has changed the return values for SQLCOD.  It now has
flavors and where V4R5 and below returned a 0 or 100 may not return the same
value in V5R1.  It has to do with if all of the selected fields are
returned.  We were told to test a field SQLSTT (a 5 byte character value)
for '00000' (SQLCOD value of 0) of '02000' (SQLCOD value of 100).  Has
anyone heard of this?
Bill Erhardt
Baldwin Hardware

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.