RE: Fix Security (was: Paging file)

jt

IIRC, one reason for having QSECOFR sign on is related to the transfer of
ownership and authority when restoring things.

Vern

At 09:50 AM 10/30/2002 -0500, you wrote:

Booth, this is less of an issue than it might appear.  Although I'm NOT
necessarily contradicting what Leif has been saying.

The 3rd party vendors that I've dealt with back in the days of yore (JDE,
Lawson, Synon, and ProData too, probably) ALREADY took whatever authority
they wanted.

Almost EVERY package I've EVER loaded had the first instruction of the
install state "Sign on as Security Officer".  Never much cottoned to that,
but it was "Generally Accepted Computer Practice", back 10 or 20 years
ago...  I'm guessing it still is these days.