× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. October 2002

RE: system save

I'm not sure why you would want to automate a "load next tape" message
reply.  If you don't have an automatic tape advance, you certainly don't
want to reply until the next tape is loaded.  Taking the cancel option
seems kind of self-defeating.

Andy Nolen-Parkhouse

> On Behalf Of jt
> Subject: RE: system save
>
> That could be the case, now.
>
> Back when We had to throw together a hack to do fully-unattended
backups
> (in
> '92), the "next tape" messages weren't handled by the SYSRPYL.
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | [mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Steve Landess
> |
> | If the message is an Inquiry message (one requiring a reply), I'm
pretty
> | sure that you can answer it with a reply list entry...the only thing
you
> | have to do is make sure that the job in question is using
> | INQMSGRPY(*SYSRPYL)...
> | Steve

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.