RE: Performance hit for Remote outqs? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Performance hit for Remote outqs?
From: Buck Calabro <Buck.Calabro@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:24:34 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>I would love to know the real story myself and aside from
>the cpu % for host printer transform, IBM does not talk about
>it much.

I was thinking only about the host print transform numbers, and your
comments about immediate print faintly stir a memory of WHERE the cycles are
used.  If IPDS DEVD, then I think the iSeries sends the overlay/page
segment.  If remote, I think the iSeries converts it to PCL/PJL and sends
that.

Good call!
  --buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.