|
Isn't this the lesson we learned from M$? It seems to me that their stragegy has been pretty clear and consistent: first you capture the market; then you concentrate on building your profits. Leif may be correct that IBM thinks that milking the OS/400 market until it's dead is the best way to go, but I think it's fair to argue that over the longer term it's a bad idea for everyone -- stockholders, customers, and employees -- because a dead market won't generate anything. It seems to me that the combination of OS/400 with DB2 is the best available environment for transaction-intensive businesses (this isn't just my idea -- I think Joe Pluta says the same thing), and if I were an IBMer looking to still be around in 10 or 15 years I'd be trying to a) get that environment into every place it could reasonably fit, and b) foster a developer community that will produce the add-ons needed to make it useful for actual businesses. I think that the calls for smaller, cheaper boxes are basically suggesting that these would be one way of moving in that direction,and the perception is that it's not happening. No offense at all to Anne Lucas, but think about it -- if everyone who's interested in a small developer box has to contact her personally, how likely is it that Jane Doe who read somewhere about the iSeries and thought it sounded interesting is ever going to find out? Suppose I run a small tool shop, with maybe 30-40 employees and a 6-node PC network, and I'm thinking of taking the next step. Is there a clear iSeries choice, or should I really wait until I'm three times as big? Realistically, if I have to wait I'll already have another system by then, and the sales job will be that much harder. If Leif is right, IBM's answer is that I should move to Linux, and then when I get big enough I can buy an iSeries (or whatever) to run it on. Frankly, I don't see why anyone at IBM would think that was intelligent advice. Just my $.02 midrange-l@midrange.com writes: >Did I not learn >either in my university business courses or through work experience in >general that sometimes doing something that does not generate a direct >profit may, in fact, generate indirect profit down the road? This is not >genius-speak fer cryin out loud! Mike Naughton Senior Programmer/Analyst Judd Wire, Inc. 124 Turnpike Road Turners Falls, MA 01376 413-863-4357 x444 mnaughton@juddwire.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.