RE: disk arms (was RE: Tips for user ASP)

[Scott Mildenberger <Smildenber@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Evan,

The worst offending job is using CPYF and CPYFRMQRYF to move some of the
records around, it probably copies about 10+ million records.  One other job
does use blocking where it can but a lot of what it has to do doesn't allow
the blocking to help too much.  I am sure that this could be helped some by
redesigning these apps but it is only a few that really cause the problem
and they are only run a few times a month so we have minimized the impact
with how we schedule them.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evan Harris [mailto:spanner@ihug.co.nz]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 2:32 PM
> To: midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject: RE: disk arms (was RE: Tips for user ASP)
>
>
> Hi Scott
>
> as a matter of interest are these jobs designed to take advantage of
> blocking/sequential access to minimize disk access ?
>
> Anyone - is there a way to see that blocking is being
> utilized other than
> trying to use the open files WRKJOB display ?
>
> Regards
> Evan Harris
>