|
but it always was, way back to S/38 ----- Original Message ----- From: Alan Cassidy <acassidy@pioneermetals.com> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:14 PM Subject: Re: The Future of the AS/400 (was Re: Developer Lease to 1.75%????) > Sorry, I thought that was clear in the text following...: "But now they have > the OS successfully seceded from the hardware.." > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org> > To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:08 PM > Subject: Re: The Future of the AS/400 (was Re: Developer Lease to 1.75%????) > > > > From: Alan Cassidy <acassidy@pioneermetals.com> > > > May I second this motion. I even thought once about IBM just marketing > > > OS/400 indpendent of the hardware. It became quickly clear that it was > made > > > to fit the hardware. > > > > I think not. IBM touts the Technology Independent nature of OS/400. > > It can run on any hardware. > >
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.