RE: CPW? vs System Performance -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: CPW? vs System Performance
From: Konrad Underkofler <kdunderk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:21:01 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Rob,

We currently don't have that issue on the 620 since there
is no governor, just the normal priority scheduling of
interactive at the top of the heap. Have a job open a few
hundred files and interactive can get pretty intense very
fast.

We definitely want to overkill the interactive piece on
a new system to avoid system degradation and get some
headroom. I do hope they have fixed any outstanding CFINT
problems by the time we get there.

Regards

Konrad

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.