Re: FrEaKy! Batch work runs under interactive job, but doesn't tie up the interactive job... -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: FrEaKy! Batch work runs under interactive job, but doesn't tie up the interactive job...
From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 11:02:35 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

From: Dan Bale <dbale@samsa.com>

> I have never seen this before.  Using SST to dump several program objects.
> For each one, I get a message "Dump to printer successfully submitted."  So
> I figure it's submitting a batch job for each of these, right?  Wrong.

SST and DST are designed to work even if most of OS/400 either
isn't there or doesn't work, so SST and DST do things a little differently.
Nothing to worry about.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.