× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If I can get the field names, sizes, & types automagically filled in, I'm
halfway there.  I'm not looking to press a single key and expect a finished
DDS member; I realize I'll have to inspect it.  Even if I do nothing else, I
now have something I can use (easily) in query and DBU/WRKDBF-type tools,
not to mention any new apps I write.

Actually, what I'm finding for this client is that they have the F&I specs
for each physical file in its own separate member.  Field description in
columns 75-120.  So there's my TEXT( ) right there.  Just a little tweaking
to the automagic app.

- Dan Bale
(I am *NOT* "Dale"
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/200105/msg00281.html )
SAMSA, Inc.
989-790-0507
DBale@SAMSA.com <mailto:DBale@SAMSA.com>
  Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
  (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
[mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Pat Barber
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:43 AM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: Tool to convert s/36 RPG I-specs to DDS???


OK... the "average" file can be done in a few minutes, but a 200 field
file is going to take a little longer. I don't believe I have ever seen
a S/36 F&I spec that accounted for every single byte in the file and
this normally can't be handled by a program. By the time you get a
"clean" version of the F&I, you could have written the DDS....

The tools will not create those wonderful(taken for granted) field
descriptions that we are all used to. This feature alone is worth
the time it takes to do it correctly.

I did a ton of S/36 conversions and found that the tools that were
offered were usually too crude to suit my taste. A typical S/36 file
set can be converted(and cleaned up) in a controlled manner and the
results will be much better. Mass changes create "mass mess" in my
opinion. I don't care for field names like: fld001,fld002,etc,etc.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.