|
True. So to protect against qualified access over FTP or some such, need authorization removed, not visibility. The issue I addressed was a different one, that you don't know who is really attached when you convert to a single profile. At 06:27 PM 4/13/02 -0700, you wrote: >Vernon, > >Changing library list also does not secure the objects in the payroll (or >any other ) library. It simply makes it less obvious to the user that the >data is available. A user can navigate around ht library list pretty >easily. > >jte > >-- >John Earl >www.powertechgroup.com john.earl@powertechgroup.com >The Powertech Group Inc. Seattle, Washington >Where the Security Experts Live! > >Phone: +1-253-872-7788 >Fax: +1-253-872-7904 >-- >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Vernon Hamberg" <vhamberg@attbi.com> >To: <midrange-l@midrange.com> >Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:59 PM >Subject: Re: Exit Point Question/profile switching... > > > > 'Nutha thought - if you change to a single profile, you lose some tracking > > ability. Changing library list preserves history. > > > > At 12:10 AM 4/13/02 +0100, you wrote: > > >Instead of trying to switch user profiles, perhaps you could use the > > >exit point to restrict access to the appropriate libraries. This would > > >be easier I think. > > > > > >Syd Nicholson
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.